[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200325161455.7610-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 17:14:54 +0100
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
To: <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
CC: <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <krzysztof.struczynski@...wei.com>,
<silviu.vlasceanu@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] ima: Remove redundant policy rule set in add_rules()
From: Krzysztof Struczynski <krzysztof.struczynski@...wei.com>
Function ima_appraise_flag() returns the flag to be set in
temp_ima_appraise depending on the hook identifier passed as an argument.
It is not necessary to set the flag again for the POLICY_CHECK hook.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Struczynski <krzysztof.struczynski@...wei.com>
---
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index c334e0dc6083..ea9b991f0232 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -643,11 +643,8 @@ static void add_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *entries, int count,
list_add_tail(&entry->list, &ima_policy_rules);
}
- if (entries[i].action == APPRAISE) {
+ if (entries[i].action == APPRAISE)
temp_ima_appraise |= ima_appraise_flag(entries[i].func);
- if (entries[i].func == POLICY_CHECK)
- temp_ima_appraise |= IMA_APPRAISE_POLICY;
- }
}
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists