[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200325164046.p2oxemcjnj2tnxbz@treble>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:40:46 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, mbenes@...e.cz, brgerst@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 26/26] objtool: Add STT_NOTYPE noinstr validation
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:53:48PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 09:42:11AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > Sure, but couldn't validate_unwind_hints() and
> > validate_reachable_instructions() be changed to *only* run on
> > .noinstr.text, for the vmlinux case? That might help converge the
> > vmlinux and !vmlinux paths.
>
> You're thinking something like so then?
Not exactly. But I don't want to keep churning this patch set. I can
add more patches later, so don't worry about it.
But I was thinking it would eventually be good to have the top-level
check() be like
sec = NULL;
if (!validate_all)
sec = find_section_by_name(file->elf, ".noinstr.text");
ret = validate_functions(&file, sec);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
warnings += ret;
ret = validate_unwind_hints(&file, sec);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
warnings += ret;
if (!warnings) {
ret = validate_reachable_instructions(&file, sec);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
warnings += ret;
}
if (!validate_all)
goto out;
ret = validate_retpoline(&file);
....
that way the general flow is the same regardless...
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists