linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v13 8/8] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add bindings doc for AD9467 ADC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:45:39 +0000
From:   "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com>
To:     "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Grozav, Andrei" <Andrei.Grozav@...log.com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
        "Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        "Nagy, Laszlo" <Laszlo.Nagy@...log.com>,
        "Csomortani, Istvan" <Istvan.Csomortani@...log.com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Bogdan, Dragos" <Dragos.Bogdan@...log.com>,
        "Costina, Adrian" <Adrian.Costina@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 8/8] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add bindings doc for
 AD9467 ADC

On Thu, 2020-03-26 at 12:56 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:46:36 +0200, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> > This change adds the binding doc for the AD9467 ADC.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad9467.yaml          | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/adi,ad9467.yaml
> > 
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

My bad. Apologies for that.
No idea how I missed adding this. Especially since I already know that I should
add it.

I guess I got mixed up with too many branches and not paying attention.