lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f319e48-d955-c821-7bed-c85c634976f1@ti.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Mar 2020 22:14:31 +0200
From:   Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To:     Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
CC:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
        Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 02/11] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: separate hw
 counter read from timecounter



On 26/03/2020 16:18, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 09:42:35PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Separate hw counter read from timecounter code:
>> - add CPTS context field to store current HW counter value
>> - move HW timestamp request and FIFO read code out of timecounter code
>> - convert cyc2time on event reception in cpts_fifo_read()
>> - call timecounter_read() in cpts_fifo_read() to update tk->cycle_last
> 
> This comment tells us WHAT the patch does, but does not help because
> we can see that from the patch itself.  Instead, the comment should
> tell us WHY is change is needed.
> 
> I was left scratching my head, with the question, what is the purpose
> here?  Maybe the answer is to be found later on in the series.
> 
> Here is commit message pattern to follow that I learned from tglx:
> 
> 1. context
> 2. problem
> 3. solution
> 
> For this patch, the sentence, "Separate hw counter read from
> timecounter code" is #3.

Sorry, will update.

-- 
Best regards,
grygorii

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ