[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200326203752.497029-1-leonardo@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 17:37:52 -0300
From: Leonardo Bras <leonardo@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Leonardo Bras <leonardo@...ux.ibm.com>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/1] ppc/smp: Replace unnecessary 'while' by 'if'
spin_until_cond() will wait until nmi_ipi_busy == false, and
nmi_ipi_lock_start() does not seem to change nmi_ipi_busy, so there is
no way this while will ever repeat.
Replace this 'while' by an 'if', so it does not look like it can repeat.
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leonardo@...ux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
index ea6adbf6a221..7c904d6fb4d2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static int __smp_send_nmi_ipi(int cpu, void (*fn)(struct pt_regs *),
return 0;
nmi_ipi_lock_start(&flags);
- while (nmi_ipi_busy) {
+ if (nmi_ipi_busy) {
nmi_ipi_unlock_end(&flags);
spin_until_cond(!nmi_ipi_busy);
nmi_ipi_lock_start(&flags);
--
2.24.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists