linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] hugetlbfs: add arch_hugetlb_valid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Mar 2020 16:10:56 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        "David S.Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Longpeng <longpeng2@...wei.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Shutemov, Kirill" <kirill.shutemov@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] hugetlbfs: add arch_hugetlb_valid_size

On 3/26/20 2:56 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> Perhaps it would be best to check hugepages_supported() when parsing
> hugetlb command line options.  If not enabled, throw an error.  This
> will be much easier to do after moving all command line parsing to
> arch independent code.

Yeah, that sounds sane.

> Is that a sufficient way to address this concern?  I think it is a good
> change in any case.

(Thanks to Kirill for pointing this out.)

So, it turns out the x86 huge page enumeration is totally buggered.
X86_FEATURE_PSE is actually meaningless on 64-bit (and 32-bit PAE).  All
CPUs architecturally support 2MB pages regardless of X86_FEATURE_PSE and
the state of CR4.PSE.

So, on x86_64 at least, hugepages_supported() should *always* return 1.

1GB page support can continue to be dependent on X86_FEATURE_GBPAGES.