lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:23:50 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Mark Wunderlich <mark.wunderlich@...el.com>,
        Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.5 21/28] nvmet-tcp: set MSG_MORE only if we actually have more to send

From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>

[ Upstream commit 98fd5c723730f560e5bea919a64ac5b83d45eb72 ]

When we send PDU data, we want to optimize the tcp stack
operation if we have more data to send. So when we set MSG_MORE
when:
- We have more fragments coming in the batch, or
- We have a more data to send in this PDU
- We don't have a data digest trailer
- We optimize with the SUCCESS flag and omit the NVMe completion
  (used if sq_head pointer update is disabled)

This addresses a regression in QD=1 with SUCCESS flag optimization
as we unconditionally set MSG_MORE when we didn't actually have
more data to send.

Fixes: 70583295388a ("nvmet-tcp: implement C2HData SUCCESS optimization")
Reported-by: Mark Wunderlich <mark.wunderlich@...el.com>
Tested-by: Mark Wunderlich <mark.wunderlich@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c
index af674fc0bb1e4..5bb5342b8d0c7 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static int nvmet_try_send_data_pdu(struct nvmet_tcp_cmd *cmd)
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static int nvmet_try_send_data(struct nvmet_tcp_cmd *cmd)
+static int nvmet_try_send_data(struct nvmet_tcp_cmd *cmd, bool last_in_batch)
 {
 	struct nvmet_tcp_queue *queue = cmd->queue;
 	int ret;
@@ -523,9 +523,15 @@ static int nvmet_try_send_data(struct nvmet_tcp_cmd *cmd)
 	while (cmd->cur_sg) {
 		struct page *page = sg_page(cmd->cur_sg);
 		u32 left = cmd->cur_sg->length - cmd->offset;
+		int flags = MSG_DONTWAIT;
+
+		if ((!last_in_batch && cmd->queue->send_list_len) ||
+		    cmd->wbytes_done + left < cmd->req.transfer_len ||
+		    queue->data_digest || !queue->nvme_sq.sqhd_disabled)
+			flags |= MSG_MORE;
 
 		ret = kernel_sendpage(cmd->queue->sock, page, cmd->offset,
-					left, MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_MORE);
+					left, flags);
 		if (ret <= 0)
 			return ret;
 
@@ -660,7 +666,7 @@ static int nvmet_tcp_try_send_one(struct nvmet_tcp_queue *queue,
 	}
 
 	if (cmd->state == NVMET_TCP_SEND_DATA) {
-		ret = nvmet_try_send_data(cmd);
+		ret = nvmet_try_send_data(cmd, last_in_batch);
 		if (ret <= 0)
 			goto done_send;
 	}
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists