[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f97d9dc54178e4344512bc7986265f101f4639c6.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 17:01:57 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
Fabien DESSENNE <fabien.dessenne@...com>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
xiang xiao <xiaoxiang781216@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] tty: add rpmsg driver
On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 14:31 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> The question was exactly about that: can a compiler optimize it to a
> bare number or will strlen call remain there?
$ cat str.c
#include <string.h>
int foo(void)
{
return strlen("abc");
}
$ gcc -c -O2 str.c
$ objdump -d str.o
str.o: file format elf64-x86-64
Disassembly of section .text:
0000000000000000 <foo>:
0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64
4: b8 03 00 00 00 mov $0x3,%eax
9: c3 retq
Powered by blists - more mailing lists