linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/6] arm64: tlb: add support for TTL feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:15:27 +0800
From:   Zhenyu Ye <yezhenyu2@...wei.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:     <mark.rutland@....com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <guohanjun@...wei.com>, <will@...nel.org>,
        <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
        <maz@...nel.org>, <steven.price@....com>, <arm@...nel.org>,
        <Dave.Martin@....com>, <arnd@...db.de>, <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        <npiggin@...il.com>, <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
        <broonie@...nel.org>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <xiexiangyou@...wei.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/6] arm64: tlb: add support for TTL feature

On 2020/3/25 21:32, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:49:45PM +0800, Zhenyu Ye wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On 2020/3/24 23:01, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 09:45:28PM +0800, Zhenyu Ye wrote:
>>>> In order to reduce the cost of TLB invalidation, the ARMv8.4 TTL
>>>> feature allows TLBs to be issued with a level allowing for quicker
>>>> invalidation.  This series provide support for this feature. 
>>>>
>>>> Patch 1 and Patch 2 was provided by Marc on his NV series[1] patches,
>>>> which detect the TTL feature and add __tlbi_level interface.
>>>
>>> I realy hate how it makes vma->vm_flags more important for tlbi.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for your review.
>>
>> The tlbi interfaces only have two parameters: vma and addr. If we
>> try to not use vma->vm_flags, we may should have to add a parameter
>> to some of these interfaces(such as flush_tlb_range), which are
>> common to all architectures.
>>
>> I'm not sure if this is feasible, because this feature is only
>> supported by ARM64 currently.
> 
> Power (p9-radix) also has level dependent invalidation instructions, so
> at the very least you can hook them up as well.
> 
> .
>

Thanks, I will push my next version soon.

Zhenyu
.