| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzbZ0Y+BXezgbdzN2T1cH9osREJUNQQoQJ5rJ0EYyD-Udg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:49:09 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...gle.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 4/8] bpf: lsm: Implement attach, detach and execution
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 8:27 AM KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
>
> JITed BPF programs are dynamically attached to the LSM hooks
> using BPF trampolines. The trampoline prologue generates code to handle
> conversion of the signature of the hook to the appropriate BPF context.
>
> The allocated trampoline programs are attached to the nop functions
> initialized as LSM hooks.
>
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM programs must have a GPL compatible license and
> and need CAP_SYS_ADMIN (required for loading eBPF programs).
>
> Upon attachment:
>
> * A BPF fexit trampoline is used for LSM hooks with a void return type.
> * A BPF fmod_ret trampoline is used for LSM hooks which return an
> int. The attached programs can override the return value of the
> bpf LSM hook to indicate a MAC Policy decision.
>
> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Florent Revest <revest@...gle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf_lsm.h | 11 ++++++++
> kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/bpf/btf.c | 9 ++++++-
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 17 ++++++++++---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 19 +++++++++++---
> 6 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
[...]
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index 85567a6ea5f9..3ba30fd6101e 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> #include <linux/nospec.h>
> #include <linux/audit.h>
> #include <uapi/linux/btf.h>
> +#include <linux/bpf_lsm.h>
>
> #define IS_FD_ARRAY(map) ((map)->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY || \
> (map)->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGROUP_ARRAY || \
> @@ -1935,6 +1936,7 @@ bpf_prog_load_check_attach(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
>
> switch (prog_type) {
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING:
> + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM:
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS:
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT:
> break;
> @@ -2367,10 +2369,28 @@ static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog)
> struct file *link_file;
> int link_fd, err;
>
> - if (prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_TRACE_FENTRY &&
> - prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_TRACE_FEXIT &&
> - prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_MODIFY_RETURN &&
> - prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT) {
> + switch (prog->type) {
> + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING:
> + if (prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_TRACE_FENTRY &&
> + prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_TRACE_FEXIT &&
> + prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_MODIFY_RETURN) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_put_prog;
> + }
> + break;
> + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT:
> + if (prog->expected_attach_type != 0) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_put_prog;
> + }
> + break;
> + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM:
> + if (prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_LSM_MAC) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_put_prog;
> + }
> + break;
> + default:
thanks, this is much more "scalable" in terms of maintenance!
> err = -EINVAL;
> goto out_put_prog;
> }
> @@ -2449,16 +2469,10 @@ static int bpf_raw_tracepoint_open(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> if (IS_ERR(prog))
> return PTR_ERR(prog);
>
> - if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT &&
> - prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
> - prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT &&
> - prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE) {
> - err = -EINVAL;
> - goto out_put_prog;
> - }
> -
> - if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING ||
> - prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT) {
> + switch (prog->type) {
> + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING:
> + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT:
> + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM:
> if (attr->raw_tracepoint.name) {
> /* The attach point for this category of programs
> * should be specified via btf_id during program load.
> @@ -2466,11 +2480,13 @@ static int bpf_raw_tracepoint_open(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> err = -EINVAL;
> goto out_put_prog;
> }
> - if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP)
> + if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP) {
this should probably also ensure prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING ?
Otherwise you can trick kernel with BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM and
expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP, no?
> tp_name = prog->aux->attach_func_name;
> - else
> - return bpf_tracing_prog_attach(prog);
> - } else {
> + break;
> + }
> + return bpf_tracing_prog_attach(prog);
> + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT:
> + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE:
> if (strncpy_from_user(buf,
> u64_to_user_ptr(attr->raw_tracepoint.name),
> sizeof(buf) - 1) < 0) {
> @@ -2479,6 +2495,10 @@ static int bpf_raw_tracepoint_open(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> }
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists