[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4Bzbn3jAXPEBPWtxk6UUN9iWbmb_bnPYzSoA7du-Nz-Mbxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:56:52 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...gle.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 6/8] tools/libbpf: Add support for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 8:27 AM KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
>
> Since BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM uses the same attaching mechanism as
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, the common logic is refactored into a static
> function bpf_program__attach_btf_id.
>
> A new API call bpf_program__attach_lsm is still added to avoid userspace
> conflicts if this ever changes in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Florent Revest <revest@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> ---
LGTM.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
> tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 3 ++-
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 4 ++++
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 3 +++
> 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists