[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <02c6dfa8-0e13-d1d7-e335-ad8f1a3ecb1f@web.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:41:46 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] mmap locking API: convert mmap_sem call sites missed
by coccinelle
> Convert the last few remaining mmap_sem rwsem calls to use the new
> mmap locking API. These were missed by coccinelle for some reason
I find such a software situation unfortunate.
Should the transformation approach be clarified any further?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists