[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200326142049.GD20841@localhost>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 07:20:49 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 03/11] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: move tc mult
update in cpts_fifo_read()
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 09:42:36PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Now CPTS driver .adjfreq() generates request to read CPTS current time
> (CPTS_EV_PUSH) with intention to process all pending event using previous
> frequency adjustment values before switching to the new ones. So
> CPTS_EV_PUSH works as a marker to switch to the new frequency adjustment
> values. Current code assumes that all job is done in .adjfreq(), but after
> enabling IRQ this will not be true any more.
>
> Hence save new frequency adjustment values (mult) and perform actual freq
> adjustment in cpts_fifo_read() immediately after CPTS_EV_PUSH is received.
Now THIS comment is much better! The explanation here really should
be in the previous patch, to help poor reviewers like me.
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists