[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200326145709.GB11398@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:57:09 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, bristot@...hat.com, jbaron@...mai.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...nel.org, namit@...are.com, hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH v3 09/17] x86/static_call: Add out-of-line static
call implementation
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 02:56:12PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +static void __static_call_transform(void *insn, u8 opcode, void *func)
> +{
> + const void *code = text_gen_insn(opcode, (long)insn, (long)func);
> +
> + if (WARN_ONCE(*(u8 *)insn != opcode,
> + "unexpected static call insn opcode 0x%x at %pS\n",
> + opcode, insn))
> + return;
> +
> + if (memcmp(insn, code, CALL_INSN_SIZE) == 0)
> + return;
> +
> + text_poke_bp(insn, code, CALL_INSN_SIZE, NULL);
Right, this is working with CALL_INSN_SIZE but ...
> +}
> +
> +void arch_static_call_transform(void *site, void *tramp, void *func)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
> +
> + if (tramp)
> + __static_call_transform(tramp, JMP32_INSN_OPCODE, func);
... it gets called with JMP32_INSN_OPCODE too. I mean, both lengths are
equal and all - it is just a bit confusing at a first glance. Maybe slap
a small comment that it is ok.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists