[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200326170128.GQ20713@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 18:01:28 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Cc: x86 <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"mhiramat@...nel.org" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"bristot@...hat.com" <bristot@...hat.com>,
"jbaron@...mai.com" <jbaron@...mai.com>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
tglx <tglx@...utronix.de>, "mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
"jpoimboe@...hat.com" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH v3 06/17] static_call: Add basic static call
infrastructure
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 04:42:07PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > On Mar 24, 2020, at 6:56 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > + * API overview:
> > + *
> > + * DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(name, func);
> > + * DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(name, func);
> > + * static_call(name)(args...);
> > + * static_call_update(name, func);
> > + *
> > + * Usage example:
> > + *
> > + * # Start with the following functions (with identical prototypes):
> > + * int func_a(int arg1, int arg2);
> > + * int func_b(int arg1, int arg2);
> > + *
> > + * # Define a 'my_name' reference, associated with func_a() by default
> > + * DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(my_name, func_a);
>
> Do you want to support optional function attributes, such as “pure” and
> “const”?
Do you see a need for that? And what is the syntax for a pointer to a
pure function?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists