linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: Allow swiotlb to live at pre-defined address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200326170516.GB6387@lst.de>
Date:   Thu, 26 Mar 2020 18:05:16 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        x86@...nel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        dwmw@...zon.com, benh@...zon.com,
        Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, alcioa@...zon.com,
        aggh@...zon.com, aagch@...zon.com, dhr@...zon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: Allow swiotlb to live at pre-defined address

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 05:29:22PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> The swiotlb is a very convenient fallback mechanism for bounce buffering of
> DMAable data. It is usually used for the compatibility case where devices
> can only DMA to a "low region".
> 
> However, in some scenarios this "low region" may be bound even more
> heavily. For example, there are embedded system where only an SRAM region
> is shared between device and CPU. There are also heterogeneous computing
> scenarios where only a subset of RAM is cache coherent between the
> components of the system. There are partitioning hypervisors, where
> a "control VM" that implements device emulation has limited view into a
> partition's memory for DMA capabilities due to safety concerns.
> 
> This patch adds a command line driven mechanism to move all DMA memory into
> a predefined shared memory region which may or may not be part of the
> physical address layout of the Operating System.
> 
> Ideally, the typical path to set this configuration would be through Device
> Tree or ACPI, but neither of the two mechanisms is standardized yet. Also,
> in the x86 MicroVM use case, we have neither ACPI nor Device Tree, but
> instead configure the system purely through kernel command line options.
> 
> I'm sure other people will find the functionality useful going forward
> though and extend it to be triggered by DT/ACPI in the future.

I'm totally against hacking in a kernel parameter for this.  We'll need
a proper documented DT or ACPI way.  We also need to feed this information
into the actual DMA bounce buffering decisions and not just the swiotlb
placement.