linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] selinux: clean up indentation issue with assignment statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Mar 2020 18:44:49 -0400
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>,
        Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
        Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>, selinux@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selinux: clean up indentation issue with assignment statement

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:44 PM Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The assignment of e->type_names is indented one level too deep,
> clean this up by removing the extraneous tab.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>  security/selinux/ss/policydb.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

I generally dislike style/formatting only changes, but one could argue
that this is just plain wrong regardless of how you like your code to
look.

I also dislike merging changes into selinux/next when we are at -rc7,
but this is trivial and obviously correct.

However, despite not wanting to merge this into selinux/next I decided
to do just that - thanks for the fix. :)

> diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c
> index 932b2b9bcdb2..70ecdc78efbd 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/ss/policydb.c
> @@ -1219,10 +1219,9 @@ static int read_cons_helper(struct policydb *p,
>                                 if (rc)
>                                         return rc;
>                                 if (p->policyvers >=
> -                                       POLICYDB_VERSION_CONSTRAINT_NAMES) {
> -                                               e->type_names = kzalloc(sizeof
> -                                               (*e->type_names),
> -                                               GFP_KERNEL);
> +                                   POLICYDB_VERSION_CONSTRAINT_NAMES) {
> +                                       e->type_names = kzalloc(sizeof
> +                                               (*e->type_names), GFP_KERNEL);
>                                         if (!e->type_names)
>                                                 return -ENOMEM;
>                                         type_set_init(e->type_names);
> --
> 2.25.1

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com