[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2003271119420.17089@namei.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:24:12 +1100 (AEDT)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...gle.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 4/8] bpf: lsm: Implement attach, detach and
execution
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, KP Singh wrote:
> +int bpf_lsm_verify_prog(struct bpf_verifier_log *vlog,
> + const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> +{
> + /* Only CAP_MAC_ADMIN users are allowed to make changes to LSM hooks
> + */
> + if (!capable(CAP_MAC_ADMIN))
> + return -EPERM;
> +
Stephen, can you confirm that your concerns around this are resolved
(IIRC, by SELinux implementing a bpf_prog callback) ?
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists