[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <554c16c7-cfad-2d36-d7ae-4c17190a2b50@web.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:21:59 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] mmap locking API: convert mmap_sem call sites
missed by coccinelle
> Convert the last few remaining mmap_sem rwsem calls to use the new
> mmap locking API. These were missed by coccinelle for some reason
I find such a software situation still unfortunate.
* Should the data processing results be clarified any further
for the shown transformation approach?
* Will additional improvements be considered?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists