[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874kuaxdiz.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 12:06:44 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, len.brown@...el.com,
pkondeti@...eaurora.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, pavel@....cz,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, mojha@...eaurora.org, jkosina@...e.cz,
mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, rjw@...ysocki.net
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:smp/hotplug] cpu/hotplug: Abort disabling secondary CPUs if wakeup is pending
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com> writes:
> From the commit message, it makes sense to add the pm_wakeup_pending()
> check if freeze_secondary_cpus() is used for system suspend. However,
> freeze_secondary_cpus() is also used in kexec path on arm64:
Bah!
> kernel_kexec():
> machine_shutdown():
> disable_nonboot_cpus():
> freeze_secondary_cpus()
>
> , so I wonder whether the pm_wakeup_pending() makes sense in this
> situation? Because IIUC, in this case we want to reboot the system
> regardlessly, the pm_wakeup_pending() checking seems to be inappropriate
> then.
Fix below.
Thanks,
tglx
8<------------
--- a/include/linux/cpu.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
@@ -133,12 +133,18 @@ static inline void get_online_cpus(void)
static inline void put_online_cpus(void) { cpus_read_unlock(); }
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP
-extern int freeze_secondary_cpus(int primary);
+int __freeze_secondary_cpus(int primary, bool suspend);
+static inline int freeze_secondary_cpus(int primary)
+{
+ return __freeze_secondary_cpus(primary, true);
+}
+
static inline int disable_nonboot_cpus(void)
{
- return freeze_secondary_cpus(0);
+ return __freeze_secondary_cpus(0, false);
}
-extern void enable_nonboot_cpus(void);
+
+void enable_nonboot_cpus(void);
static inline int suspend_disable_secondary_cpus(void)
{
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -1200,7 +1200,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_up);
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP
static cpumask_var_t frozen_cpus;
-int freeze_secondary_cpus(int primary)
+int __freeze_secondary_cpus(int primary, bool suspend)
{
int cpu, error = 0;
@@ -1225,7 +1225,7 @@ int freeze_secondary_cpus(int primary)
if (cpu == primary)
continue;
- if (pm_wakeup_pending()) {
+ if (suspend && pm_wakeup_pending()) {
pr_info("Wakeup pending. Abort CPU freeze\n");
error = -EBUSY;
break;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists