linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] mfd: mp2629: Add support for mps battery charger

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:17:34 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     saravanan sekar <sravanhome@...il.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] mfd: mp2629: Add support for mps battery charger

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 02:03:30PM +0100, saravanan sekar wrote:
> On 27/03/20 1:56 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:41 PM saravanan sekar <sravanhome@...il.com> wrote:
> > > On 27/03/20 12:25 pm, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 27 Mar 2020, saravanan sekar wrote:
> > > > > On 27/03/20 11:22 am, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > So Andy has reviewed, but you still don't have him on Cc?
> > > Sorry one of his hint made me removed him in CC unknowingly.
> > > 
> > > "For the future, hint:
> > >           scripts/get_maintainer.pl --git --git-min-percent=67 ..."
> > > 
> > Perhaps I have to elaborate. The above hint for the initial submit.
> > Then the rule of thumb: Include reviewers into Cc (to the patches they
> > have reviewed), because you can't know their intention and maybe they
> > want to follow a development.
> Thanks for more details. Between Lee has not recommended "forward
> declarations", the review comment
> you gave on my V1 patch (more info on previous email). Hope you agree with
> the same.

I think so.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko