lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200327150710.GA31821@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:07:10 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org,
        bp@...en8.de, james.morse@....com, tony.luck@...el.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, linuxarm@...wei.com,
        jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, tanxiaofei@...wei.com,
        yangyicong@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] ACPI / APEI: Add support to notify the vendor
 specific HW errors

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:42:21PM +0000, Shiju Jose wrote:
> Presently the vendor drivers are unable to do the recovery for the
> vendor specific recoverable HW errors, reported to the APEI driver
> in the vendor defined sections, because APEI driver does not support
> reporting the same to the vendor drivers.
> 
> This patch set
> 1. add an interface to the APEI driver to enable the vendor
> drivers to register the event handling functions for the corresponding
> vendor specific HW errors and report the error to the vendor driver.
> 
> 2. add driver to handle HiSilicon hip08 PCIe controller's errors
>    which is an example application of the above APEI interface.
> 
> Changes:
> 
> V6:
> 1. Fix few changes in the patch subject line suggested by Bjorn Helgaas.

I think it will save everybody a little work if you can wait a day or
two so you can address more comments at once.  You posted v6 only
about three hours after v5, which isn't enough time for people to
respond to v5.

I'm not going to even look at v6 because it doesn't address some of my
v5 comments.  Please wait a few days before v7 to see if Rafael has
any thoughts on where the error driver should live.

Bjorn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ