[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D5721ED6-774B-4CD3-8533-4BF9BDB2401E@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:55:06 -0400
From: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
CC: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] khugepaged: Allow to collapse PTE-mapped compound
pages
On 27 Mar 2020, at 13:05, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> We can collapse PTE-mapped compound pages. We only need to avoid
> handling them more than once: lock/unlock page only once if it's present
> in the PMD range multiple times as it handled on compound level. The
> same goes for LRU isolation and putpack.
s/putpack/putback/
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> mm/khugepaged.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index b47edfe57f7b..c8c2c463095c 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -515,6 +515,17 @@ void __khugepaged_exit(struct mm_struct *mm)
>
> static void release_pte_page(struct page *page)
> {
> + /*
> + * We need to unlock and put compound page on LRU only once.
> + * The rest of the pages have to be locked and not on LRU here.
> + */
> + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageCompound(page) &&
> + (!PageLocked(page) && PageLRU(page)), page);
It only checks base pages.
Add
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageCompound(page) && PageLocked(page) && PageLRU(page), page);
to check for compound pages.
> +
> + if (!PageLocked(page))
> + return;
> +
> + page = compound_head(page);
> dec_node_page_state(page, NR_ISOLATED_ANON + page_is_file_cache(page));
> unlock_page(page);
> putback_lru_page(page);
> @@ -537,6 +548,7 @@ static int __collapse_huge_page_isolate(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> pte_t *_pte;
> int none_or_zero = 0, result = 0, referenced = 0;
> bool writable = false;
> + LIST_HEAD(compound_pagelist);
>
> for (_pte = pte; _pte < pte+HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> _pte++, address += PAGE_SIZE) {
> @@ -561,13 +573,23 @@ static int __collapse_huge_page_isolate(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - /* TODO: teach khugepaged to collapse THP mapped with pte */
> + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageAnon(page), page);
> +
> if (PageCompound(page)) {
> - result = SCAN_PAGE_COMPOUND;
> - goto out;
> - }
> + struct page *p;
> + page = compound_head(page);
>
> - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageAnon(page), page);
> + /*
> + * Check if we have dealt with the compount page
s/compount/compound/
> + * already
> + */
> + list_for_each_entry(p, &compound_pagelist, lru) {
> + if (page == p)
> + break;
> + }
> + if (page == p)
> + continue;
> + }
>
> /*
> * We can do it before isolate_lru_page because the
> @@ -640,6 +662,9 @@ static int __collapse_huge_page_isolate(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> page_is_young(page) || PageReferenced(page) ||
> mmu_notifier_test_young(vma->vm_mm, address))
> referenced++;
> +
> + if (PageCompound(page))
> + list_add_tail(&page->lru, &compound_pagelist);
> }
> if (likely(writable)) {
> if (likely(referenced)) {
Do we need a list here? There should be at most one compound page we will see here, right?
If a compound page is seen here, can we bail out the loop early? I guess not,
because we can a partially mapped compound page at the beginning or the end of a VMA, right?
> @@ -1185,11 +1210,7 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
> goto out_unmap;
> }
>
> - /* TODO: teach khugepaged to collapse THP mapped with pte */
> - if (PageCompound(page)) {
> - result = SCAN_PAGE_COMPOUND;
> - goto out_unmap;
> - }
> + page = compound_head(page);
>
> /*
> * Record which node the original page is from and save this
> --
> 2.26.0
—
Best Regards,
Yan Zi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (855 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists