linux-kernel - [RFC][PATCH v2 4/8] objtool: whitelist __sanitizer_cov_trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200327022836.881203-4-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 27 Mar 2020 02:28:32 +0000
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH v2 4/8] objtool: whitelist __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch()

From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>

it's not really different from e.g. __sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp4();
as it is, the switches that generate an array of labels get
rejected by objtool, while slightly different set of cases
that gets compiled into a series of comparisons is accepted.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
---
 tools/objtool/check.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
index 4768d91c6d68..3667c5d7453a 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -478,6 +478,7 @@ static const char *uaccess_safe_builtin[] = {
 	"__sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp2",
 	"__sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp4",
 	"__sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp8",
+	"__sanitizer_cov_trace_switch",
 	/* UBSAN */
 	"ubsan_type_mismatch_common",
 	"__ubsan_handle_type_mismatch",
-- 
2.11.0