[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3164e566-d54e-2254-32c4-d7fee47c37ea@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 21:34:05 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Jean-Philippe Menil <jpmenil@...il.com>,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] bpf: fix build warning - missing prototype
On 3/27/20 8:55 AM, Jean-Philippe Menil wrote:
> Fix build warnings when building net/bpf/test_run.o with W=1 due
> to missing prototype for bpf_fentry_test{1..6}.
>
> Instead of declaring prototypes, turn off warnings with
> __diag_{push,ignore,pop} as pointed by Alexei.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Menil <jpmenil@...il.com>
Looks better, but this doesn't apply cleanly. Please respin to latest bpf-next tree, thanks.
> ---
> net/bpf/test_run.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> index d555c0d8657d..cc1592413fc3 100644
> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> @@ -113,6 +113,9 @@ static int bpf_test_finish(const union bpf_attr *kattr,
> * architecture dependent calling conventions. 7+ can be supported in the
> * future.
> */
> +__diag_push();
> +__diag_ignore(GCC, 8, "-Wmissing-prototypes",
> + "Global functions as their definitions will be in vmlinux BTF);
> int noinline bpf_fentry_test1(int a)
> {
> return a + 1;
> @@ -143,6 +146,8 @@ int noinline bpf_fentry_test6(u64 a, void *b, short c, int d, void *e, u64 f)
> return a + (long)b + c + d + (long)e + f;
> }
>
> +__diag_pop();
> +
> static void *bpf_test_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 size,
> u32 headroom, u32 tailroom)
> {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists