[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200327212358.5752-11-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 21:23:57 +0000
From: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
To: julia.lawall@...6.fr
Cc: boqun.feng@...il.com, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] trace: Replace printk and WARN_ON with WARN
Coccinelle suggests replacing printk and WARN_ON with WARN
SUGGESTION: printk + WARN_ON can be just WARN.
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@...il.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 6b11e4e2150c..1fe31272ea73 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -1799,9 +1799,7 @@ static int run_tracer_selftest(struct tracer *type)
/* the test is responsible for resetting too */
tr->current_trace = saved_tracer;
if (ret) {
- printk(KERN_CONT "FAILED!\n");
- /* Add the warning after printing 'FAILED' */
- WARN_ON(1);
+ WARN(1, "FAILED!\n");
return -1;
}
/* Only reset on passing, to avoid touching corrupted buffers */
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists