[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANN689EDuc-9tcBcOOP+4CWeAxjKJq95yxJtZXvCo3H0GBcyrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:52:09 -0700
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>,
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] mmap locking API: initial implementation as
rwsem wrappers
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 5:16 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 07:10:49PM -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
>
> > +static inline bool mmap_is_locked(struct mm_struct *mm)
> > +{
> > + return rwsem_is_locked(&mm->mmap_sem) != 0;
> > +}
>
> I didn't notice any callers to this in the series? Can it be deleted?
Good catch. Yes, it should be deleted. There were 5 uses in v1 of this
patchset and I got rid of these in v2 of the patchset, but forgot to
actually remove the function definition here.
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists