[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANN689HyS0dYWZw3AeWGBvN6_2G4hRDzjMJQ_adHMh0ZkiACYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 01:53:27 -0700
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [v3 05/10] mmap locking API: convert mmap_sem call sites missed
by coccinelle
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 1:39 AM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> wrote:
> > I would be interested to find out why coccinelle wasn't able to do the
> > last 1%, but only as part of a long-term learning process on getting
> > better with coccinelle - …
>
> How will corresponding software development resources evolve?
I don't think I understand the question, or, actually, are you asking
me or the coccinelle developers ?
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists