[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3973478a-8f41-e09a-dc20-fe82bc46577a@web.de>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 10:01:31 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Liam Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [v3 05/10] mmap locking API: convert mmap_sem call sites missed
by coccinelle
>>> I would be interested to find out why coccinelle wasn't able to do the
>>> last 1%, but only as part of a long-term learning process on getting
>>> better with coccinelle - …
>>
>> How will corresponding software development resources evolve?
>
> I don't think I understand the question,
Various aspects can be reconsidered.
> or, actually, are you asking me or the coccinelle developers ?
I am curious how much the change interests will grow by involved
contributors and organisations.
Would you like to discuss affected implementation details any further?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists