lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:15:14 +0300
From:   Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] fanotify: Fix the checks in fanotify_fsid_equal

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 8:10 PM Nathan Chancellor
<natechancellor@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Clang warns:
>
> fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c:28:23: warning: self-comparison always
> evaluates to true [-Wtautological-compare]
>         return fsid1->val[0] == fsid1->val[0] && fsid2->val[1] == fsid2->val[1];
>                              ^
> fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c:28:57: warning: self-comparison always
> evaluates to true [-Wtautological-compare]
>         return fsid1->val[0] == fsid1->val[0] && fsid2->val[1] == fsid2->val[1];
>                                                                ^
> 2 warnings generated.
>
> The intention was clearly to compare val[0] and val[1] in the two
> different fsid structs. Fix it otherwise this function always returns
> true.
>
> Fixes: afc894c784c8 ("fanotify: Store fanotify handles differently")
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/952
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
> ---

Ouch! Good catch!

It would have been quite hard to catch this with tests as
non equal fsid and equal fid are quite rare in the wild.
I will try to write some test with mounts of cloned loop devs.

Thanks,
Amir.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ