[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac67cfc3736cf50c716b823a59af878d59b7198f.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 14:30:29 +0100
From: Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@...il.com>
To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: krzk@...nel.org, avri.altman@....com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
kwmad.kim@...sung.com, stanley.chu@...iatek.com,
cang@...eaurora.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] arm64: dts: Add node for ufs exynos7
On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 22:36 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Adding dt node foe UFS and UFS-PHY for exynos7 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
> ---
> .../boot/dts/exynos/exynos7-espresso.dts | 16 +++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi | 43 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7-espresso.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7-espresso.dts
> index 7af288fa9475..b59a0a32620a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7-espresso.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7-espresso.dts
> @@ -406,6 +406,22 @@
> };
> };
>
> +&ufs {
> + status = "okay";
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&ufs_rst_n &ufs_refclk_out>;
> + ufs,pwr-attr-mode = "FAST";
> + ufs,pwr-attr-lane = <2>;
> + ufs,pwr-attr-gear = <2>;
> + ufs,pwr-attr-hs-series = "HS_rate_b";
> + ufs-rx-adv-fine-gran-sup_en = <1>;
> + ufs-rx-adv-fine-gran-step = <3>;
> + ufs-rx-adv-min-activate-time-cap = <9>;
> + ufs-pa-granularity = <6>;
> + ufs-pa-tacctivate = <3>;
> + ufs-pa-hibern8time = <20>;
> +};
> +
> &usbdrd_phy {
> vbus-supply = <&usb30_vbus_reg>;
> vbus-boost-supply = <&usb3drd_boost_5v>;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi
> index 5558045637ac..9d16c90edd07 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi
> @@ -220,9 +220,14 @@
> #clock-cells = <1>;
> clocks = <&fin_pll>, <&clock_top1 DOUT_ACLK_FSYS1_200>,
> <&clock_top1 DOUT_SCLK_MMC0>,
> - <&clock_top1 DOUT_SCLK_MMC1>;
> + <&clock_top1 DOUT_SCLK_MMC1>,
> + <&clock_top1 DOUT_SCLK_UFSUNIPRO20>,
> + <&clock_top1 DOUT_SCLK_PHY_FSYS1>,
> + <&clock_top1 DOUT_SCLK_PHY_FSYS1_26M>;
> clock-names = "fin_pll", "dout_aclk_fsys1_200",
> - "dout_sclk_mmc0", "dout_sclk_mmc1";
> + "dout_sclk_mmc0", "dout_sclk_mmc1",
> + "dout_sclk_ufsunipro20", "dout_sclk_phy_fsys1",
> + "dout_sclk_phy_fsys1_26m";
> };
>
> serial_0: serial@...30000 {
> @@ -601,6 +606,40 @@
> };
> };
>
> + ufs: ufs@...70000 {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos7-ufs";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + ranges;
> + reg = <0x15570000 0x100>, /* 0: HCI standard */
> + <0x15570100 0x100>, /* 1: Vendor specificed */
> + <0x15571000 0x200>, /* 2: UNIPRO */
> + <0x15572000 0x300>; /* 3: UFS protector */
> + reg-names = "hci", "vs_hci", "unipro", "ufsp";
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 200 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&clock_fsys1 ACLK_UFS20_LINK>,
> + <&clock_fsys1 SCLK_UFSUNIPRO20_USER>;
> + clock-names = "core_clk", "sclk_unipro_main";
> + freq-table-hz = <0 0>, <0 0>;
> + pclk-freq-avail-range = <70000000 133000000>;
> + ufs,pwr-local-l2-timer = <8000 28000 20000>;
> + ufs,pwr-remote-l2-timer = <12000 32000 16000>;
> + phys = <&ufs_phy>;
> + phy-names = "ufs-phy";
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + ufs_phy: ufs-phy@...5571800 {
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos7-ufs-phy";
> + reg = <0x15571800 0x240>;
> + reg-names = "phy-pma";
> + samsung,pmu-syscon = <&pmu_system_controller>;
> + #phy-cells = <0>;
> + clocks = <&clock_fsys1 MOUT_FSYS1_PHYCLK_SEL1>,
> + <&clock_top1 CLK_SCLK_PHY_FSYS1_26M>;
> + clock-names = "ref_clk_parent", "ref_clk";
Hi
Is this correct (aren't child and parent clock swapped)?
This will set MOUT_FSYS1_PHYCLK_SEL1 to be parent clock of
CLK_SCLK_PHY_FSYS1_26M.
I've tested this on Exynos7420 (which looks like can use the same clock
driver as exynos7) and after adding some debug code (because currently
we're not handling result of samsung_ufs_phy_clks_init) i got
samsung-ufs-phy 15571800.ufs-phy: clk_set_parent result: -22
On vendor sources for this device, driver was setting
CLK_SCLK_PHY_FSYS1_26M to be parent of MOUT_FSYS1_PHYCLK_SEL1, and then
it did run without error.
samsung-ufs-phy 15571800.ufs-phy: clk_set_parent result: 0
Also looking at clk-exynos7 driver seems to confirm this.
> + };
> +
> usbdrd_phy: phy@...00000 {
> compatible = "samsung,exynos7-usbdrd-phy";
> reg = <0x15500000 0x100>;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists