[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ffd7a0863a6667b85d024f82904f853e@walle.cc>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 18:20:17 +0100
From: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] gpio: add support for the sl28cpld GPIO controller
Am 2020-03-18 10:14, schrieb Bartosz Golaszewski:
> wt., 17 mar 2020 o 21:50 Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc> napisał(a):
>>
>> This adds support for the GPIO controller of the sl28 board management
>> controller. This driver is part of a multi-function device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> thanks for the driver. Please take a look at some comments below.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 11 ++
>> drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-sl28cpld.c | 332
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 344 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-sl28cpld.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
>> index 3cbf8882a0dd..516e47017ef5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
>> @@ -1211,6 +1211,17 @@ config GPIO_RC5T583
>> This driver provides the support for driving/reading the
>> gpio pins
>> of RC5T583 device through standard gpio library.
>>
>> +config GPIO_SL28CPLD
>> + tristate "Kontron sl28 GPIO"
>> + depends on MFD_SL28CPLD
>> + depends on OF_GPIO
>> + select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
>
> Please see below - I think both are not needed.
>
>> + help
>> + This enables support for the GPIOs found on the Kontron sl28
>> CPLD.
>> +
>> + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
>> will be
>> + called gpio-sl28cpld.
>> +
>> config GPIO_STMPE
>> bool "STMPE GPIOs"
>> depends on MFD_STMPE
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
>> index 0b571264ddbc..0ca2d52c78e8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
>> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SCH311X) +=
>> gpio-sch311x.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SCH) += gpio-sch.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SIFIVE) += gpio-sifive.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SIOX) += gpio-siox.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SL28CPLD) += gpio-sl28cpld.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SODAVILLE) += gpio-sodaville.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SPEAR_SPICS) += gpio-spear-spics.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SPRD) += gpio-sprd.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sl28cpld.c
>> b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sl28cpld.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..94f82013882f
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sl28cpld.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +/*
>> + * SMARC-sAL28 GPIO driver.
>> + *
>> + * Copyright 2019 Kontron Europe GmbH
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
>> +
>> +#define GPIO_REG_DIR 0
>> +#define GPIO_REG_OUT 1
>> +#define GPIO_REG_IN 2
>> +#define GPIO_REG_IE 3
>> +#define GPIO_REG_IP 4
>
> These values would be more clear if they were defined as hex.
>
>> +
>> +#define GPI_REG_IN 0
>> +
>> +#define GPO_REG_OUT 0
>
> Please also use a common prefix even for defines.
>
>> +
>> +enum sl28cpld_gpio_type {
>> + sl28cpld_gpio,
>> + sl28cpld_gpi,
>> + sl28cpld_gpo,
>> +};
>
> Enum values should be all upper-case.
>
>> +
>> +struct sl28cpld_gpio {
>> + struct gpio_chip gpio_chip;
>> + struct irq_chip irq_chip;
>> + struct regmap *regmap;
>> + u32 offset;
>> + struct mutex lock;
>> + u8 ie;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void sl28cpld_gpio_set_reg(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned
>> int reg,
>> + unsigned int offset, int value)
>> +{
>> + struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>> + unsigned int mask = 1 << offset;
>> + unsigned int val = value << offset;
>> +
>> + regmap_update_bits(gpio->regmap, gpio->offset + reg, mask,
>> val);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void sl28cpld_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int
>> offset,
>> + int value)
>> +{
>> + sl28cpld_gpio_set_reg(chip, GPIO_REG_OUT, offset, value);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void sl28cpld_gpo_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int
>> offset,
>> + int value)
>> +{
>> + sl28cpld_gpio_set_reg(chip, GPO_REG_OUT, offset, value);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sl28cpld_gpio_get_reg(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int
>> reg,
>> + unsigned int offset)
>> +{
>> + struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>> + unsigned int mask = 1 << offset;
>> + unsigned int val;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_read(gpio->regmap, gpio->offset + reg, &val);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return (val & mask) ? 1 : 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sl28cpld_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int
>> offset)
>> +{
>> + return sl28cpld_gpio_get_reg(chip, GPIO_REG_IN, offset);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sl28cpld_gpi_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int
>> offset)
>> +{
>> + return sl28cpld_gpio_get_reg(chip, GPI_REG_IN, offset);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sl28cpld_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>> + unsigned int offset)
>> +{
>> + struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>> + unsigned int reg;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_read(gpio->regmap, gpio->offset + GPIO_REG_DIR,
>> ®);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (reg & (1 << offset))
>> + return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_OUT;
>> + else
>> + return GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_IN;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sl28cpld_gpio_set_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>> + unsigned int offset,
>> + bool output)
>> +{
>> + struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>> + unsigned int mask = 1 << offset;
>> + unsigned int val = (output) ? mask : 0;
>> +
>> + return regmap_update_bits(gpio->regmap, gpio->offset +
>> GPIO_REG_DIR,
>> + mask, val);
>> +
>
> Stray newline.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sl28cpld_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>> + unsigned int offset)
>> +{
>> + return sl28cpld_gpio_set_direction(chip, offset, false);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sl28cpld_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>> + unsigned int offset, int
>> value)
>> +{
>> + sl28cpld_gpio_set_reg(chip, GPIO_REG_OUT, offset, value);
>> + return sl28cpld_gpio_set_direction(chip, offset, true);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void sl28cpld_gpio_irq_lock(struct irq_data *data)
>> +{
>> + struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio =
>> + gpiochip_get_data(irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data));
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&gpio->lock);
>
> How does that actually lock anything? Regmap uses a different lock and
> if you want to make sure nobody modifies the GPIO registers than you'd
> need to use the same lock. Also: this looks a lot like a task for
> regmap_irqchip - maybe you could use it here or in the core mfd
> module?
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void sl28cpld_gpio_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
>> +{
>> + struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio =
>> + gpiochip_get_data(irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data));
>> +
>> + regmap_write(gpio->regmap, gpio->offset + GPIO_REG_IE,
>> gpio->ie);
>> + mutex_unlock(&gpio->lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void sl28cpld_gpio_irq_disable(struct irq_data *data)
>> +{
>> + struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio =
>> + gpiochip_get_data(irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data));
>> +
>> + if (data->hwirq >= 8)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + gpio->ie &= ~(1 << data->hwirq);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void sl28cpld_gpio_irq_enable(struct irq_data *data)
>> +{
>> + struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio =
>> + gpiochip_get_data(irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data));
>> +
>> + if (data->hwirq >= 8)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + gpio->ie |= (1 << data->hwirq);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sl28cpld_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned
>> int type)
>> +{
>> + /* only edge triggered interrupts on both edges are supported
>> */
>> + return (type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t sl28cpld_gpio_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio = data;
>> + unsigned int ip;
>> + unsigned int virq;
>> + int pin;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_read(gpio->regmap, gpio->offset + GPIO_REG_IP,
>> &ip);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return IRQ_NONE;
>> +
>> + /* mask other pending interrupts which are not enabled */
>> + ip &= gpio->ie;
>> +
>> + /* ack the interrupts */
>> + regmap_write(gpio->regmap, gpio->offset + GPIO_REG_IP, ip);
>> +
>> + /* and handle them */
>> + while (ip) {
>> + pin = __ffs(ip);
>> + ip &= ~BIT(pin);
>> +
>> + virq = irq_find_mapping(gpio->gpio_chip.irq.domain,
>> pin);
>> + if (virq)
>> + handle_nested_irq(virq);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>
> This definitely looks like parts of regmap_irqchip reimplemented.
> Please check if you could reuse it - it would save a lot of code.
>
>> +
>> +static int sl28_cpld_gpio_irq_init(struct platform_device *pdev, int
>> irq)
>> +{
>> + struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> + struct irq_chip *irq_chip = &gpio->irq_chip;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + irq_chip->name = "sl28cpld-gpio-irq",
>> + irq_chip->irq_bus_lock = sl28cpld_gpio_irq_lock,
>> + irq_chip->irq_bus_sync_unlock = sl28cpld_gpio_irq_sync_unlock,
>> + irq_chip->irq_disable = sl28cpld_gpio_irq_disable,
>> + irq_chip->irq_enable = sl28cpld_gpio_irq_enable,
>> + irq_chip->irq_set_type = sl28cpld_gpio_irq_set_type,
>> + irq_chip->flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
>> +
>> + ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(&gpio->gpio_chip, irq_chip,
>> 0,
>> + handle_simple_irq,
>> IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
>> + sl28cpld_gpio_irq_thread,
>> + IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>> + pdev->name, gpio);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(&gpio->gpio_chip, irq_chip, irq);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int sl28cpld_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + enum sl28cpld_gpio_type type =
>> + platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data;
>> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> + struct sl28cpld_gpio *gpio;
>> + struct gpio_chip *chip;
>> + struct resource *res;
>> + bool irq_support = false;
>> + int ret;
>> + int irq;
>> +
>> + gpio = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*gpio), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!gpio)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + if (!pdev->dev.parent)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>
> Why not check this before allocating any memory?
>
>> +
>> + gpio->regmap = dev_get_regmap(pdev->dev.parent, NULL);
>> + if (!gpio->regmap)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_REG, 0);
>> + if (!res)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + gpio->offset = res->start;
>> +
>
> This isn't how IO resources are used. What are you trying to achieve
> here?
>
>> + /* initialize struct gpio_chip */
>> + mutex_init(&gpio->lock);
>> + chip = &gpio->gpio_chip;
>> + chip->parent = &pdev->dev;
>> + chip->label = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
>> + chip->owner = THIS_MODULE;
>> + chip->can_sleep = true;
>> + chip->base = -1;
>> + chip->ngpio = 8;
>> +
>> + switch (type) {
>> + case sl28cpld_gpio:
>> + chip->get_direction = sl28cpld_gpio_get_direction;
>> + chip->direction_input = sl28cpld_gpio_direction_input;
>> + chip->direction_output =
>> sl28cpld_gpio_direction_output;
>> + chip->get = sl28cpld_gpio_get;
>> + chip->set = sl28cpld_gpio_set;
>> + irq_support = true;
>> + break;
>> + case sl28cpld_gpo:
>> + chip->set = sl28cpld_gpo_set;
>> + chip->get = sl28cpld_gpi_get;
>> + break;
>> + case sl28cpld_gpi:
>> + chip->get = sl28cpld_gpi_get;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, chip, gpio);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gpio);
>> +
>> + if (irq_support && of_property_read_bool(np,
>> "interrupt-controller")) {
>
> You're depending on OF_GPIO for this one function. Please switch to
> device_property_read_bool() instead.
>
>> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> + if (irq < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = sl28_cpld_gpio_irq_init(pdev, irq);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct platform_device_id sl28cpld_gpio_id_table[] = {
>> + {"sl28cpld-gpio", sl28cpld_gpio},
>> + {"sl28cpld-gpi", sl28cpld_gpi},
>> + {"sl28cpld-gpo", sl28cpld_gpo},
>
> Could you explain this a bit more? Is this the same component with
> input/output-only lines or three different components?
>
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, sl28cpld_gpio_id_table);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver sl28cpld_gpio_driver = {
>> + .probe = sl28cpld_gpio_probe,
>> + .id_table = sl28cpld_gpio_id_table,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "sl28cpld-gpio",
>> + },
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(sl28cpld_gpio_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("sl28cpld GPIO Driver");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
> I think you could use a MODULE_ALIAS() here if you want this module to
> be loaded automatically by udev.
Turns out MODULE_ALIAS("platform:..") isn't working with mfd and
OF_MFD_CELL(), because the match is done on "of:.." module aliases.
So I guess I'll need a of_device_id array after all, although the
matching for the mfd is via the platform driver name.
-michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists