linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] iio: adc: mp2629: Add support for mp2629 ADC driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200328175116.13c2bae3@archlinux>
Date:   Sat, 28 Mar 2020 17:51:16 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Saravanan Sekar <sravanhome@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-iio <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] iio: adc: mp2629: Add support for mp2629 ADC
 driver

On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:52:11 +0200
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 2:12 AM Saravanan Sekar <sravanhome@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add support for 8-bit resolution ADC readings for input power
> > supply and battery charging measurement. Provides voltage, current
> > readings to mp2629 power supply driver.  
> 
> ...
> 
> > +               ret = regmap_read(info->regmap, chan->address, &rval);
> > +               if (ret < 0)  
> 
> ' < 0' is not needed for regmap call.
> 
> ..
> 
> > +               case MP2629_INPUT_CURRENT:
> > +                       *val = 133;
> > +                       *val2 = 10;
> > +                       return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL;
> > +
> > +               default:
> > +                       return -EINVAL;
> > +               }
> > +
> > +       default:
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +       }  
> 
> > +
> > +       return 0;  
> 
> Do you really need this? Looks to me as dead code.
> 
> ...
> 
> > +       indio_dev->name = dev_name(dev);  
> 
> Shouldn't be this a part number?
> I heard something, so, I might be mistaken, but I hope maintainers
> will help here.

It should indeed.  I have a nasty habit of missing this in
review so thanks for pointing it out!

Jonathan