[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABnpCuBLkk2RQovNmcx1U9+oou18cmrd71eQ8=O=ELOM_NcjSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 18:36:42 +0000
From: Shane Francis <bigbeeshane@...il.com>
To: "Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@...el.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/prime: fix extracting of the DMA addresses from a scatterlist
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 6:31 PM Ruhl, Michael J
<michael.j.ruhl@...el.com> wrote:
> Is there an example of what the scatterlist would look like in this case?
>
> Does each SG entry always have the page and dma info? or could you have
> entries that have page information only, and entries that have dma info only?
>
> If the same entry has different size info (page_len = PAGE_SIZE,
> dma_len = 4 * PAGE_SIZE?), are we guaranteed that the arrays (page and addrs) have
> been sized correctly?
>
> Just trying to get my head wrapped around this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
My understanding is that page_len and dma_len in this case could have
different values (looking at iommu_dma_map_sg within dma-iommu.c),
this seems to add some padding calculated by using the device iova
domain to s_length but sg_dma_len is set to the original length
The scatterlists table can also get reduced down within
"__finalise_sg" possibly causing (if reduced) the dma_len of the last
table elements to be 0 (page_len would not be 0 in this case).
Documentation around looping & accessing scatterlists in DMA-API.txt
states that sg_dma_address() and sg_dma_len() should be used when
accessing addr and len rather than sg->address and sg->length.
Maybe it would be worth splitting this out into 2 functions to avoid
potential issues with the above use case ?
Regards,
Shane Francis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists