[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <354de5d2a3bc4d19d2972885fa9189d1@codeaurora.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 10:30:54 +0800
From: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
avri.altman@....com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
beanhuo@...ron.com, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, bvanassche@....org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kuohong.wang@...iatek.com, peter.wang@...iatek.com,
chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com, andy.teng@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] scsi: ufs: set device as active power mode after
resetting device
Hi Stanley,
On 2020-03-28 10:14, Can Guo wrote:
> On 2020-03-27 17:58, Stanley Chu wrote:
>> Currently ufshcd driver assumes that bInitPowerMode parameter
>> is not changed by any vendors thus device power mode can be set as
>> "Active" during initialization.
>>
>> According to UFS JEDEC specification, device power mode shall be
>> "Active" after HW Reset is triggered if the bInitPowerMode parameter
>> in Device Descriptor is default value.
>>
>> By above description, we can set device power mode as "Active" after
>> device reset is triggered by vendor's callback. With this change,
>> the link startup performance can be improved in some cases
>> by not setting link_startup_again as true in ufshcd_link_startup().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 13 -------------
>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>> index 227660a1a446..f0a35b289b7c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>> @@ -171,19 +171,6 @@ enum {
>> #define ufshcd_clear_eh_in_progress(h) \
>> ((h)->eh_flags &= ~UFSHCD_EH_IN_PROGRESS)
>>
>> -#define ufshcd_set_ufs_dev_active(h) \
>> - ((h)->curr_dev_pwr_mode = UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE)
>> -#define ufshcd_set_ufs_dev_sleep(h) \
>> - ((h)->curr_dev_pwr_mode = UFS_SLEEP_PWR_MODE)
>> -#define ufshcd_set_ufs_dev_poweroff(h) \
>> - ((h)->curr_dev_pwr_mode = UFS_POWERDOWN_PWR_MODE)
>> -#define ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_active(h) \
>> - ((h)->curr_dev_pwr_mode == UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE)
>> -#define ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_sleep(h) \
>> - ((h)->curr_dev_pwr_mode == UFS_SLEEP_PWR_MODE)
>> -#define ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_poweroff(h) \
>> - ((h)->curr_dev_pwr_mode == UFS_POWERDOWN_PWR_MODE)
>> -
>> struct ufs_pm_lvl_states ufs_pm_lvl_states[] = {
>> {UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE, UIC_LINK_ACTIVE_STATE},
>> {UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE, UIC_LINK_HIBERN8_STATE},
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
>> index b7bd81795c24..7a9d1d170719 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
>> @@ -129,6 +129,19 @@ enum uic_link_state {
>> #define ufshcd_set_link_hibern8(hba) ((hba)->uic_link_state = \
>> UIC_LINK_HIBERN8_STATE)
>>
>> +#define ufshcd_set_ufs_dev_active(h) \
>> + ((h)->curr_dev_pwr_mode = UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE)
>> +#define ufshcd_set_ufs_dev_sleep(h) \
>> + ((h)->curr_dev_pwr_mode = UFS_SLEEP_PWR_MODE)
>> +#define ufshcd_set_ufs_dev_poweroff(h) \
>> + ((h)->curr_dev_pwr_mode = UFS_POWERDOWN_PWR_MODE)
>> +#define ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_active(h) \
>> + ((h)->curr_dev_pwr_mode == UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE)
>> +#define ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_sleep(h) \
>> + ((h)->curr_dev_pwr_mode == UFS_SLEEP_PWR_MODE)
>> +#define ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_poweroff(h) \
>> + ((h)->curr_dev_pwr_mode == UFS_POWERDOWN_PWR_MODE)
>> +
>> /*
>> * UFS Power management levels.
>> * Each level is in increasing order of power savings.
>> @@ -1091,6 +1104,7 @@ static inline void
>> ufshcd_vops_device_reset(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>> {
>> if (hba->vops && hba->vops->device_reset) {
>> hba->vops->device_reset(hba);
>> + ufshcd_set_ufs_dev_active(hba);
>> ufshcd_update_reg_hist(&hba->ufs_stats.dev_reset, 0);
>> }
>> }
>
> Reviewed-by: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
I guess what you also want my patch -
"scsi: ufs: full reinit upon resume if link was off"
Please help review it, thanks.
Best regard,
Can Guo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists