linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 7/9] proc: move hidepid values to uapi as they are user interface to mount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200328230046.v3qbffmbtl4sd7tg@comp-core-i7-2640m-0182e6>
Date:   Sun, 29 Mar 2020 00:00:46 +0100
From:   Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Security Module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>,
        Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>,
        "Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 7/9] proc: move hidepid values to uapi as they are
 user interface to mount

On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 02:53:49PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > +/* definitions for hide_pid field */
> > > > +enum {
> > > > +	HIDEPID_OFF            = 0,
> > > > +	HIDEPID_NO_ACCESS      = 1,
> > > > +	HIDEPID_INVISIBLE      = 2,
> > > > +	HIDEPID_NOT_PTRACEABLE = 4,
> > > > +};
> > > Should the numeric values still be UAPI if there is string parsing now?
> > 
> > I think yes, because these are still valid hidepid= values.
> 
> But if we don't expose the values, we can do whatever we like with
> future numbers (e.g. the "is this a value or a bit field?" question).

Alexey Dobriyan suggested to put these parameters into the UAPI and it
makes sense because these are user parameters.

-- 
Rgrds, legion