linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next] net: ena: Make some functions static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200328030620.22328-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Date:   Sat, 28 Mar 2020 11:06:20 +0800
From:   YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To:     <netanel@...zon.com>, <akiyano@...zon.com>, <gtzalik@...zon.com>,
        <saeedb@...zon.com>, <zorik@...zon.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <sameehj@...zon.com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: ena: Make some functions static

Fix sparse warnings:

drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c:460:6: warning: symbol 'ena_xdp_exchange_program_rx_in_range' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c:481:6: warning: symbol 'ena_xdp_exchange_program' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c:1555:5: warning: symbol 'ena_xdp_handle_buff' was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c
index 5703282aba8f..2cc765df8da3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c
@@ -457,10 +457,9 @@ static void ena_xdp_unregister_rxq_info(struct ena_ring *rx_ring)
 	xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&rx_ring->xdp_rxq);
 }
 
-void ena_xdp_exchange_program_rx_in_range(struct ena_adapter *adapter,
-					  struct bpf_prog *prog,
-					  int first,
-					  int count)
+static void ena_xdp_exchange_program_rx_in_range(struct ena_adapter *adapter,
+						 struct bpf_prog *prog,
+						 int first, int count)
 {
 	struct ena_ring *rx_ring;
 	int i = 0;
@@ -478,8 +477,8 @@ void ena_xdp_exchange_program_rx_in_range(struct ena_adapter *adapter,
 	}
 }
 
-void ena_xdp_exchange_program(struct ena_adapter *adapter,
-			      struct bpf_prog *prog)
+static void ena_xdp_exchange_program(struct ena_adapter *adapter,
+				     struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
 	struct bpf_prog *old_bpf_prog = xchg(&adapter->xdp_bpf_prog, prog);
 
@@ -1552,7 +1551,7 @@ static void ena_set_rx_hash(struct ena_ring *rx_ring,
 	}
 }
 
-int ena_xdp_handle_buff(struct ena_ring *rx_ring, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
+static int ena_xdp_handle_buff(struct ena_ring *rx_ring, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
 {
 	struct ena_rx_buffer *rx_info;
 	int ret;
-- 
2.17.1