[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200329184317.080356910@goodmis.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 14:43:03 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 11/21] ring-buffer: Do not disable recording when there is an iterator
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Now that the iterator can handle a concurrent writer, do not disable writing
to the ring buffer when there is an iterator present.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200317213416.759770696@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index e2de5b448c91..af2f10d9f3f1 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -4312,7 +4312,6 @@ ring_buffer_read_prepare(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu, gfp_t flags)
iter->cpu_buffer = cpu_buffer;
atomic_inc(&cpu_buffer->resize_disabled);
- atomic_inc(&cpu_buffer->record_disabled);
return iter;
}
@@ -4385,7 +4384,6 @@ ring_buffer_read_finish(struct ring_buffer_iter *iter)
rb_check_pages(cpu_buffer);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
- atomic_dec(&cpu_buffer->record_disabled);
atomic_dec(&cpu_buffer->resize_disabled);
kfree(iter->event);
kfree(iter);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists