linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] UML: add support for KASAN under x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1606942453.56384.1585508765254.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Date:   Sun, 29 Mar 2020 21:06:05 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:     Patricia Alfonso <trishalfonso@...gle.com>,
        Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
        anton ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        davidgow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-um <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML: add support for KASAN under x86_64

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@...solutions.net>
> An: "Patricia Alfonso" <trishalfonso@...gle.com>, "Jeff Dike" <jdike@...toit.com>, "richard" <richard@....at>, "anton
> ivanov" <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>, "Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>, "Dmitry Vyukov"
> <dvyukov@...gle.com>, "Brendan Higgins" <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>, "davidgow" <davidgow@...gle.com>
> CC: "kasan-dev" <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-um"
> <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. März 2020 11:32:00
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH] UML: add support for KASAN under x86_64

> Hi,
> 
>> Hi all, I just want to bump this so we can get all the comments while
>> this is still fresh in everyone's minds. I would love if some UML
>> maintainers could give their thoughts!
> 
> I'm not the maintainer, and I don't know where Richard is, but I just
> tried with the test_kasan.ko module, and that seems to work. Did you
> test that too? I was surprised to see this because you said you didn't
> test modules, but surely this would've been the easiest way?

Sorry for vanishing.

I read thought the discussion and it seems like the patch is not ready,
right?

Johannes, thanks a lot for pointing out all these issues.

Thanks,
//richard