linux-kernel - RE: i.MX8MN Errors on 5.6-RC7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 29 Mar 2020 03:29:08 +0000
From:   Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
To:     Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
CC:     arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Adam Ford-BE <aford@...conembedded.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: i.MX8MN Errors on 5.6-RC7



> Subject: Re: i.MX8MN Errors on 5.6-RC7
> 
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 7:07 AM Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Adam
> >
> > > Subject: i.MX8MN Errors on 5.6-RC7
> > >
> > > I am getting a few errors on the i.MX8MN:
> > >
> > > [    0.000368] Failed to get clock for /timer@...a0000
> > > [    0.000380] Failed to initialize '/timer@...a0000': -22
> > > [    7.203447] caam 30900000.caam: Failed to get clk 'ipg': -2
> > > [    7.334741] caam 30900000.caam: Failed to request all necessary clocks
> > > [    7.438651] caam: probe of 30900000.caam failed with error -2
> > > [    7.854193] imx-cpufreq-dt: probe of imx-cpufreq-dt failed with error -2
> > >
> > > I was curious to know if anyone else is seeing similar errors.  I
> > > already submitted a proposed fix for a DMA timeout (not shown here)
> > > which matched work already done on i.MX8MQ and i.MX8MM.
> > >
> > > I am not seeing huge differences between 8MM and 8MN in the nodes
> > > which address the timer, caam or imx-cpufreq-dt.
> > >
> > > If anyone has any suggestions, I'd love to try them.
> >
> 
> Fabio,
> 
> I tried your ATF suggestion, and it fixed some issues and introduced others:
> 
> [    0.767679] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [    0.767687] coherent pool not initialised!
> [    0.767714] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1 at kernel/dma/remap.c:190
> dma_alloc_from_pool+0x94/0xa0
> [    0.767718] Modules linked in:
> [    0.767728] CPU: 3 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
> 5.6.0-rc7-00471-g97c33f1ada5c-dirty #5
> [    0.767732] Hardware name: Beacon EmbeddedWorks i.MX8M Nano
> Development Kit (DT)
> [    0.767738] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO)
> [    0.767744] pc : dma_alloc_from_pool+0x94/0xa0
> [    0.767749] lr : dma_alloc_from_pool+0x94/0xa0
> [    0.767753] sp : ffff80001003ba10
> [    0.767756] x29: ffff80001003ba10 x28: ffff00007c868080
> [    0.767762] x27: 0000000fffffffe0 x26: ffff00007fbdd080
> [    0.767768] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff800010161b3c
> [    0.767774] x23: 0000000000001000 x22: ffff00007c86bd38
> [    0.767780] x21: ffff8000112ba000 x20: ffff00007f6ed410
> [    0.767785] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000010
> [    0.767791] x17: 00000000000045e0 x16: 00000000000045d0
> [    0.767796] x15: ffff00007f470470 x14: ffffffffffffffff
> [    0.767802] x13: ffff80009003b777 x12: ffff80001003b77f
> [    0.767807] x11: ffff8000118e1000 x10: ffff800011abc658
> [    0.767813] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 6573696c61697469
> [    0.767818] x7 : 6e6920746f6e206c x6 : 00000000000000a9
> [    0.767824] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000
> [    0.767829] x3 : 00000000ffffffff x2 : ffff8000118e1b80
> [    0.767835] x1 : 3a4437124c5a6b00 x0 : 0000000000000000
> [    0.767840] Call trace:
> [    0.767847]  dma_alloc_from_pool+0x94/0xa0
> [    0.767853]  dma_direct_alloc_pages+0x1a4/0x1e0
> [    0.767858]  dma_direct_alloc+0xc/0x20
> [    0.767863]  dma_alloc_attrs+0x7c/0xf0
> [    0.767870]  sdma_probe+0x3d4/0x7f0
> [    0.767877]  platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa0
> [    0.767885]  really_probe+0xd4/0x320
> [    0.767891]  driver_probe_device+0x54/0xf0
> [    0.767897]  device_driver_attach+0x6c/0x80
> [    0.767903]  __driver_attach+0x54/0xd0
> [    0.767908]  bus_for_each_dev+0x6c/0xc0
> [    0.767914]  driver_attach+0x20/0x30
> [    0.767919]  bus_add_driver+0x140/0x1f0
> [    0.767925]  driver_register+0x60/0x110
> [    0.767930]  __platform_driver_register+0x44/0x50
> [    0.767938]  sdma_driver_init+0x18/0x20
> [    0.767944]  do_one_initcall+0x50/0x190
> [    0.767950]  kernel_init_freeable+0x1cc/0x23c
> [    0.767958]  kernel_init+0x10/0x100
> [    0.767963]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
> [    0.767972] ---[ end trace 796b8d949d96f5f6 ]---
> 
> 
> Anson,
> 
> > Which board did you try? I just run it on i.MX8MN-EVK board, no such
> failure:
> I have a board from Beacon EmbeddedWorks based on the i.MX8MN which
> is nearly identical to the i.MX8MM which doesn't exhibit any of these errors.
> 
> I tried Fabio's suggestion of switching the version of ATF which did fix the
> Bluetooth communication errors I was getting, but I didn't show them before.
> 
> Unfortunately, I don't have the i.MX8MN-EVK right now, I'm working on
> trying to get one.
> 
> Can I ask which version of U-Boot and ATF you're using?  I am wondering if I
> need to update something else.

I am using our latest u-boot and ATF in NXP internal tree, maybe you can get the
latest release to have a try.

Anson