linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] clk: qcom: mmcc-msm8996: Properly describe GPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200330231035.GA326@bogus>
Date:   Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:10:35 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] clk: qcom: mmcc-msm8996: Properly describe GPU_GX
 gdsc

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 11:43:12AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2020-03-20 22:16:12)
> > On Fri 20 Mar 16:31 PDT 2020, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > 
> > > Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2020-03-18 22:39:00)
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,mmcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,mmcc.yaml
> > > > index 85518494ce43..65d9aa790581 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,mmcc.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,mmcc.yaml
> > > > @@ -67,6 +67,10 @@ properties:
> > > >      description:
> > > >         Protected clock specifier list as per common clock binding
> > > >  
> > > > +  vdd_gfx-supply:
> > > 
> > > Why not vdd-gfx-supply? What's with the underscore?
> > > 
> > 
> > The pad is named "VDD_GFX" in the datasheet and the schematics. I see
> > that we've started y/_/-/ in some of the newly added bindings, would you
> > prefer I follow this?
> 
> If the datasheet has this then I guess it's fine. I'll wait for Rob to
> ack.

vddgfx or vdd-gfx.

Rob