linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix return-value types in several function documentation comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:47:25 +0530
From:   Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc:     "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix return-value types in several function
 documentation comments



On 3/30/20 1:51 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> The documentation comments for ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait and
> ext4_read_inode_bitmap describe them as returning NULL on error, but
> they return an ERR_PTR on error; update the documentation to match.
> 
> The documentation comment for ext4_wait_block_bitmap describes it as
> returning 1 on error, but it returns -errno on error; update the
> documentation to match.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>

Thanks for your patch.
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>


Just a note for next time:-
"Update the documentation to match" - could be misleading.
As 'Documentation' is generally referred as info inside Documentation/
directory in kernel. We could just say as-
"Update the function comment description"


> ---
>   fs/ext4/balloc.c | 4 ++--
>   fs/ext4/ialloc.c | 2 +-
>   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> index 8fd0b3cdab4c..9a296008cf90 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
> @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static int ext4_validate_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb,
>    * Read the bitmap for a given block_group,and validate the
>    * bits for block/inode/inode tables are set in the bitmaps
>    *
> - * Return buffer_head on success or NULL in case of failure.
> + * Return buffer_head on success or an ERR_PTR in case of failure.
>    */
>   struct buffer_head *
>   ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group)
> @@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group)
>   	return ERR_PTR(err);
>   }
> 
> -/* Returns 0 on success, 1 on error */
> +/* Returns 0 on success, -errno on error */
>   int ext4_wait_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group,
>   			   struct buffer_head *bh)
>   {
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
> index f95ee99091e4..86a96dca9ebf 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int ext4_validate_inode_bitmap(struct super_block *sb,
>    * Read the inode allocation bitmap for a given block_group, reading
>    * into the specified slot in the superblock's bitmap cache.
>    *
> - * Return buffer_head of bitmap on success or NULL.
> + * Return buffer_head of bitmap on success, or an ERR_PTR on error.
>    */
>   static struct buffer_head *
>   ext4_read_inode_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, ext4_group_t block_group)
>