[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8601ad7b-30dc-14db-48e3-2ceb1f52400f@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:58:40 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] mm/page_alloc: Enumerate bad page reasons
On 03/30/2020 02:15 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 30.03.20 08:51, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Enumerate all existing bad page reasons which can be used in bad_page() for
>> reporting via __dump_page(). Unfortunately __dump_page() cannot be changed.
>> __dump_page() is called from dump_page() that accepts a raw string and is
>> also an exported symbol that is currently being used from various generic
>> memory functions and other drivers. This reduces code duplication while
>> reporting bad pages.
>
> Yeah sounds nice, but "56 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)" does not sound
> so nice ... and the "code duplication" is actually "repeating strings".
But repeating strings in very similar functions dealing with bad page state
is not bit suboptimal ?
>
> ... I don't think we want/need this.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists