[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200330131129.GB31702@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:11:29 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com, irogers@...gle.com,
tmricht@...ux.ibm.com, hushiyuan@...wei.com, hewenliang4@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: Fix arm64 gap between kernel start and
module end
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 03:41:11PM +0800, Kemeng Shi escreveu:
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Build b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Build
> index 393b9895c..37cbfa5e9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Build
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Build
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ libperf-y += header.o
> libperf-y += tsc.o
> libperf-y += sym-handling.o
> libperf-y += kvm-stat.o
> +libperf-y += machine.o
You made the patch against an old perf codebase, right? This libperf-y
above was changed to perf-y here:
commit 5ff328836dfde0cef9f28c8b8791a90a36d7a183
Author: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Date: Wed Feb 13 13:32:39 2019 +0100
perf tools: Rename build libperf to perf
----
I'm fixing this up, please check my perf/core branch later to see that
all is working as intended.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git perf/core
Thanks,
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists