linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: pca9685: remove unused duty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Mar 2020 16:18:22 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:     Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: pca9685: remove unused duty_cycle struct element

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 4:09 PM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 02:52:26PM +0100, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> > duty_cycle was only set, never read.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c | 4 ----
> >  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> Applied, thanks.

I'm not sure this patch is correct.
We already have broken GPIO in this driver. Do we need more breakage?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko