[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f2706518-def8-1566-149f-00fc1d8cc19f@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 14:29:30 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Basil Eljuse <Basil.Eljuse@....com>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Ferry Toth <fntoth@...il.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] driver core: Replace open-coded list_last_entry()
On 2020-03-30 2:11 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 3:49 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> wrote:
>> On 2020-03-30 11:13 am, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 07:40:25PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> AFAICS the difference is down to whether deferred_probe_timeout has
>> expired or not - I'm not familiar enough with this code to know
>> *exactly* what the difference is supposed to represent, nor which change
>> has actually pushed the Juno case from one state to the other (other
>> than it almost certainly can't be $SUBJECT - if this series is to blame
>> at all I'd assume it would be down to patch #1/3, but there's a bunch of
>> other rework previously queued in -next that is probably also interacting)
>
> JFYI: patch #1/3 wasn't applied.
OK, so if anyone's invested enough to want to investigate, it must be
something in John's earlier changes here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200225050828.56458-1-john.stultz@linaro.org/
Thanks,
Robin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists