[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200330134249.GF16242@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:42:49 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>
Cc: "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"helgaas@...nel.org" <helgaas@...nel.org>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com" <zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
tanxiaofei <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>,
yangyicong <yangyicong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] ACPI / APEI: Add support to notify the vendor
specific HW errors
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:55:35AM +0000, Shiju Jose wrote:
> The idea was the error handled field will help the decoding part of
> the rasdaemon to do the appropriate steps for logging the vendor error
> information depending on whether a corresponding kernel driver has
> handled the error or not.
What's the difference for rasdaemon whether the error has been handled
or not?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists