lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANLsYkxV7xWUkggBXF=ziGfmLs-EZewuzCzZ3fq56CR+xA0poQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:06:12 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-remoteproc <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        psodagud@...eaurora.org, tsoni@...eaurora.org,
        Siddharth Gupta <sidgup@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: qcom: Add bus scaling capability during bootup

Hi Rishabh,

On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 18:59, Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> During bootup since remote processors cannot request for
> additional bus bandwidth from the interconect framework,
> platform driver should provide the proxy resources. This
> is useful for scenarios where the Q6 tries to access the DDR
> memory in the initial stages of bootup. For e.g. during
> bootup or after recovery modem Q6 tries to zero out the bss
> section in the DDR. Since this is a big chunk of memory if
> don't bump up the bandwidth we might encounter timeout issues.
> This patch makes a proxy vote for maximizing the bus bandwidth
> during bootup and removes it once processor is up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@...eaurora.org>

The title of this patch contains "[PATCH 1/2]" but only one patch was
sent to the linux-remoteproc mailing list.  Is this a mistake and this
is a stand alone patch or another patch did not reach the list?

Thanks,
Mathieu

> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> index edf9d0e..8f5db8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>  #include <linux/qcom_scm.h>
>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> +#include <linux/interconnect.h>
>  #include <linux/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.h>
>  #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem.h>
>  #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem_state.h>
> @@ -28,6 +29,9 @@
>  #include "qcom_q6v5.h"
>  #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
>
> +#define PIL_TZ_AVG_BW  0
> +#define PIL_TZ_PEAK_BW UINT_MAX
> +
>  struct adsp_data {
>         int crash_reason_smem;
>         const char *firmware_name;
> @@ -62,6 +66,7 @@ struct qcom_adsp {
>         int proxy_pd_count;
>
>         int pas_id;
> +       struct icc_path *bus_client;
>         int crash_reason_smem;
>         bool has_aggre2_clk;
>
> @@ -124,6 +129,25 @@ static int adsp_load(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>
>  }
>
> +static int do_bus_scaling(struct qcom_adsp *adsp, bool enable)
> +{
> +       int rc;
> +       u32 avg_bw = enable ? PIL_TZ_AVG_BW : 0;
> +       u32 peak_bw = enable ? PIL_TZ_PEAK_BW : 0;
> +
> +       if (adsp->bus_client) {
> +               rc = icc_set_bw(adsp->bus_client, avg_bw, peak_bw);
> +               if (rc) {
> +                       dev_err(adsp->dev, "bandwidth request failed(rc:%d)\n",
> +                               rc);
> +                       return rc;
> +               }
> +       } else
> +               dev_info(adsp->dev, "Bus scaling not setup for %s\n",
> +                       adsp->rproc->name);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int adsp_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>  {
>         struct qcom_adsp *adsp = (struct qcom_adsp *)rproc->priv;
> @@ -131,9 +155,13 @@ static int adsp_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>
>         qcom_q6v5_prepare(&adsp->q6v5);
>
> +       ret = do_bus_scaling(adsp, true);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto disable_irqs;
> +
>         ret = adsp_pds_enable(adsp, adsp->active_pds, adsp->active_pd_count);
>         if (ret < 0)
> -               goto disable_irqs;
> +               goto unscale_bus;
>
>         ret = adsp_pds_enable(adsp, adsp->proxy_pds, adsp->proxy_pd_count);
>         if (ret < 0)
> @@ -183,6 +211,8 @@ static int adsp_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>         adsp_pds_disable(adsp, adsp->proxy_pds, adsp->proxy_pd_count);
>  disable_active_pds:
>         adsp_pds_disable(adsp, adsp->active_pds, adsp->active_pd_count);
> +unscale_bus:
> +       do_bus_scaling(adsp, false);
>  disable_irqs:
>         qcom_q6v5_unprepare(&adsp->q6v5);
>
> @@ -198,6 +228,7 @@ static void qcom_pas_handover(struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5)
>         clk_disable_unprepare(adsp->aggre2_clk);
>         clk_disable_unprepare(adsp->xo);
>         adsp_pds_disable(adsp, adsp->proxy_pds, adsp->proxy_pd_count);
> +       do_bus_scaling(adsp, false);
>  }
>
>  static int adsp_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> @@ -280,6 +311,14 @@ static int adsp_init_regulator(struct qcom_adsp *adsp)
>         return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(adsp->px_supply);
>  }
>
> +static void adsp_init_bus_scaling(struct qcom_adsp *adsp)
> +{
> +       adsp->bus_client = of_icc_get(adsp->dev, NULL);
> +       if (!adsp->bus_client)
> +               dev_warn(adsp->dev, "%s: unable to get bus client \n",
> +                       __func__);
> +}
> +
>  static int adsp_pds_attach(struct device *dev, struct device **devs,
>                            char **pd_names)
>  {
> @@ -410,6 +449,8 @@ static int adsp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         if (ret)
>                 goto free_rproc;
>
> +       adsp_init_bus_scaling(adsp);
> +
>         ret = adsp_pds_attach(&pdev->dev, adsp->active_pds,
>                               desc->active_pd_names);
>         if (ret < 0)
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ