[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <156ef39f-4bb2-c7fb-7bf0-abc9e0067c62@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 19:23:14 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Wei Ni <wni@...dia.com>, edubezval@...il.com
Cc: thierry.reding@...il.com, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
rui.zhang@...el.com, srikars@...dia.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] thermal: tegra: add get_trend ops
Hi Wei,
On 19/02/2019 03:15, Wei Ni wrote:
>>> +static int tegra_thermctl_get_trend(void *data, int trip, +
>>> enum thermal_trend *trend)
[ ... ]
>>> + temp = tz->temperature; + last_temp = tz->last_temperature; +
>>> mutex_unlock(&tz->lock); + + if (temp > trip_temp) { + if
>>> (temp >= last_temp) + *trend = THERMAL_TREND_RAISING; +
>>> else + *trend = THERMAL_TREND_STABLE; + } else if (temp <
>>> trip_temp) { + *trend = THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING; + } else { +
>>> *trend = THERMAL_TREND_STABLE; + } + + return 0; +} + static
>>> const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tegra_of_thermal_ops =
>>> { .get_temp = tegra_thermctl_get_temp, .set_trip_temp =
>>> tegra_thermctl_set_trip_temp, + .get_trend =
>>> tegra_thermctl_get_trend, };
It has been awhile since this patch was submitted and merged by
Eduardo. I replace him to co-maintain the thermal framework with Rui.
While figuring out the internals for code cleanup, I ended up in this
function above.
Why do you have to use this routine instead of the generic one in
get_tz_trend()?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists