linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 30 (bpf)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <08026861-d198-add1-feb8-c43f2e006cb6@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 30 Mar 2020 11:15:44 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
Cc:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 30 (bpf)

On 3/30/20 11:05 AM, KP Singh wrote:
> On 30-Mar 19:54, KP Singh wrote:
> 
> So, it looks like bpf_tracing_func_proto is only defined when
> CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS is set:
> 
>         obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS) += bpf_trace.o
> 
> We have a few options:
> 
> * Add a __weak symbol for bpf_tracing_func_proto which we have done in
>   the past for similar issues. This however, does not make much sense,
>   as CONFIG_BPF_LSM cannot really do much without its helpers.
> * Make CONFIG_BPF_LSM depend on CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS, this should solve
>   it, but not for this particular Kconfig that was generated. Randy,
>   I am assuming if we add the dependency, this particular Kconfig
>   won't be generated.

Hi KP,
That sounds reasonable.

Thanks.

> 
> I am assuming this patch now needs to be sent for "bpf" and not
> "bpf-next" as the merge window has opened?
> 
> - KP
> 
>> Thanks for adding me Daniel, taking a look.
>>
>> - KP
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 7:25 PM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> [Cc KP, ptal]
>>>
>>> On 3/30/20 7:15 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>> On 3/30/20 2:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> The merge window has opened, so please do not add any material for the
>>>>> next release into your linux-next included trees/branches until after
>>>>> the merge window closes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since 20200327:
>>>>
>>>> (note: linux-next is based on linux 5.6-rc7)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> on i386:
>>>>
>>>> ld: kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.o:(.rodata+0x0): undefined reference to `bpf_tracing_func_proto'
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Full randconfig file is attached.


-- 
~Randy